Singapore police issue Malaysian lawyer a conditional warning for contempt over statements on drug traffickers

0
4

SINGAPORE, July 9 (The Straits Times/ANN): The Singapore Police Force (SPF) mentioned on Saturday (July 9) that Malaysian lawyer Zaid Abd Malek had been served a 24-month conditional warning for contempt of courtroom over his statements about Malaysian drug traffickers in an article.

The article, which appeared within the Malay Mail on February 14, 2020, had referred to statements made by Zaid concerning the dismissal of lawsuits by the Singapore High Court filed by two convicted Malaysian drug traffickers, Gobi Avedian and Datchinamurthy Kataiah, over the alleged execution strategies practised by jail authorities.

Gobi Avedian was sentenced to fifteen years’ jail and 10 strokes of the cane in October 2020, whereas Datchinamurthy Kataiah’s execution is being stayed due to a pending civil declare.

Zaid, who made the feedback in his capability because the director of non-governmental organisation, Lawyers for Liberty, had additionally recommended that the Singapore courts had been unfair and ignored due course of by speeding the listening to, and that the courts had been “bent on dismissing the fits and continuing to execution”.

“These statements had been printed on-line and accessed by members of the general public in Singapore,” the SPF mentioned in a assertion.

The police’s response got here two days after Zaid wrote in a Facebook submit about how he had been detained and interrogated by the police when he arrived in Singapore on July 4 (Monday).

Zaid mentioned he made the journey to help and supply authorized recommendation to the household of Malaysian Kalwant Singh, who was executed at Changi Prison on Thursday (July 7) after being convicted of drug trafficking.

Zaid mentioned when he arrived at Seletar Airport, he was requested to attend by an immigration officer. He wrote that he was not allowed to go away and was made to attend for 4 hours with none clarification.

He was later taken to a room and served a discover ordering him to be current on the Police Cantonment Complex on Wednesday (July 6) to be investigated for a potential contempt of courtroom offence, and was warned to not depart the nation.

At the police HQ at Cantonment on Wednesday, Zaid mentioned he was interrogated for two and a half hours and was advised to return later that evening.

That evening, he mentioned he was advised that he had dedicated the offence of contempt of courtroom, and given two conditional warnings – one directed to him and the opposite directed to Lawyers for Liberty.

In his Facebook submit, Zaid mentioned his detention and interrogation had been “acts of calculated intimidation and harassment by the Singapore authorities” due to his work and his talking out “in opposition to the injustices involving Malaysian prisoners in Singapore’s demise penalty regime”.

He additionally mentioned the police probe had obstructed and hampered him in helping Kalwant Singh’s household and that he had advised the police about his function in Singapore.

In its assertion on Saturday, the SPF mentioned Zaid was not in Singapore when an order was issued by the Attorney-General’s Chambers on March 17, 2020, authorising the police to analyze him for alleged contempt of courtroom.

When he arrived in Singapore on Monday, two officers went to the airport to serve an order requiring his attendance for investigations.

Zaid advised the officers he was accessible for an interview on July 6 and was allowed to go away the airport.

The police mentioned earlier than the interview began on July 6, Zaid was knowledgeable that he might request for breaks at any level through the interview.

The police added: “Statement recording started at about 10.17am and ended at about 12.05pm, and Mr Zaid didn’t request for any break all through the interview.”

Zaid left the Police Cantonment Complex shortly after the assertion recording ended.

The similar day, the police served a 24-month conditional warning to Mr Zaid and Lawyers for Liberty in lieu of prosecution for contempt of courtroom.

Zaid arrived at Cantonment Complex that evening at about 8:50pm and acquired the warnings, and left the constructing at about 9:20pm, earlier than his scheduled departure from Singapore the following day.

The police mentioned: “Under Section 11 of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016, the publication in relation to contempt of courtroom, if printed via the Internet or different digital media, is taken to be printed in Singapore if it was accessed by members of the general public in Singapore.” – The Straits Times/ANN



Source link