Witness admits to contradictions in statements about RM3.5mil commission sought by Bung Moktar


KUALA LUMPUR: The foremost witness in the corruption trial involving Sabah Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Seri Bung Moktar Radin admitted in Sessions Court right here on Tuesday (Dec 7) that there have been contradictions between his testimony in courtroom and his recorded statements offered by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC).

During a cross-examination by Deputy Public Prosecutor Law Chin How, Public Mutual Berhad funding agent Madhi Abdul Hamid, 43, agreed that there was a contradiction when he advised the courtroom there was no request for a commission by Bung Moktar at Hotel Continental on May 4, 2015, whereas his recorded statements in 2016 confirmed in any other case.

“I agree there’s a contradiction, however I did make a recorded assertion to the MACC on Feb 4, 2021, and the contents of that assertion on May 4 is similar with my assertion in courtroom.

“I gave two contradicting variations to the MACC as a result of I used to be burdened on the time. I’ve by no means been questioned in the MACC constructing and I solely gave my assertion primarily based on what I felt and remembered at the moment, as a result of there have been many statements,” he mentioned, including that MACC took his recorded statements on July 13, 14 and 25, in addition to Oct 14, 2016, whereas the final assertion was made nearly 5 years later, on Feb 4, 2021.

The witness disagreed with Law that the recorded assertion on Feb 4, 2021 was fabricated with the intention of saving the accused.

The scenario in courtroom grew tense when Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Sophian Zakaria pressed the witness about the contradictions in his statements relating to the RM3.5mil request by Bung Moktar.

Mohd Sophian questioned why such a fabric contradiction existed in the witness’ assertion in courtroom and his 4 recorded statements offered by the MACC as he was not threatened or coerced into offering a press release.

“After 4 years and 4 months, I made a brand new recorded assertion with the MACC. I felt I simply had the power to present the assertion that was supposed to have been made as a result of for 4 years I had been in search of the power, I actually couldn’t work,” Madhi replied hesitantly.

Mohd Sophian additionally requested the witness to clarify his actions in offering totally different statements, as his recorded assertion offered to MACC beforehand concerned the way forward for a political chief who was then charged in courtroom.

“The assertion I gave was primarily based on what I remembered and I bear in mind higher when I’m calm,” he mentioned.

Madhi, the prosecution’s twenty fourth witness, was questioned following Judge Rozina Ayob’s choice to enable the prosecution to cross-examine him as a hostile witness after his Nov 26 assertion in courtroom contradicted his recorded statements when he was questioned by the MACC.

He had learn his recorded statements earlier throughout the cross-examination, which said that Bung Moktar had sought a commission of RM3.5mil as an inducement to acquire approval from Federal Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Authority (Felcra) Berhad to make investments RM150mil in the unit belief.

Other particulars in the recorded statements included that the RM3.5mil Bung Moktar requested was a part of the commission Madhi and one other Public Mutual funding agent, Norhaili Ahmad Mokhtar would obtain from the deal.

In his recorded statements, Madhi mentioned that he and Norhaili knowledgeable Bung Moktar’s spouse, Datin Seri Zizie Izette Abdul Samad at Public Bank Taman Melawati right here that the financial institution had solely RM2.2mil in money on June 12, 2015, and that Norhaili advised Zizie they might solely present RM2.8mil as they’d many issues to pay, together with funds to the agent who would deal with the Felcra Berhad account.

“Zizie requested Norhaili to inform Datuk Seri Bung himself as the cash was sought by Datuk Seri Bung and never herself. Norhaili then contacted Datuk Seri Bung however I didn’t hear what was mentioned.

“After the decision, Norhaili advised Zizie that Datuk Bung Moktar agreed that the cost be decreased to RM2.8mil,” he mentioned, studying the recorded assertion, including that he and Norhaili didn’t give the commission to Zizie.

“The RM2.8mil was not a commission cost for Zizie. The RM2.8mil was sought by Datuk Seri Bung, which I understood was a reward for Datuk Seri Bung as he had assisted Norhaili and I in securing the funding from Felcra,” he learn from his recorded statements.

On May 3, 2019, Bung Moktar, who can be Kinabatangan MP, pleaded not responsible to two counts of receiving bribes price RM2.2mil and RM262,500 as inducements to acquire Felcra approval to make investments RM150mil in Public Mutual unit belief.

Bung Moktar, 63, who was Felcra non-executive chairman on the time, allegedly acquired the bribe from Madhi by way of Zizie at Public Bank Taman Melawati department right here between 12.30pm and 5pm, June 12, 2015.

He additionally pleaded not responsible to receiving a money bribe of RM335,500 from Norhaili underneath Zizie Izette’s identify for a similar purpose on the similar place on June 19, 2015.

Zizie Izette, 43, in the meantime, pleaded not responsible on three prices of abetting her husband on the identical matter on the similar place, date and time.

The listening to in entrance of Rozina will proceed on Dec 20.- Bernama

Source link